• About Me

    Claus Schafhalter is executive level Management Consultant and owner of Sunogos - Change for the Better


    Click to get your own widget

  • « | Home | »

    12 Principles Of Green Engineering

    By Claus Schafhalter | February 18, 2010

    In 2003 sci­en­tists pro­posed ideas for green engi­neer­ing. Based on work done to artic­u­late prin­ci­ples for green chem­istry, Anas­tas and Zim­mer­mann devel­oped prin­ci­ples for “Green Engineering”.

    I do like the prag­matic approach inher­ent in these prin­ci­ples. I think it is worth to look at these prin­ci­ples:

    12 Prici­ples For Green Engi­neer­ing:

    1. Inher­ent Rather Than Cir­cum­stan­tial
      Design­ers need to strive to ensure that all mate­ri­als and energy inputs and out­puts are as inher­ently non­haz­ardous as possible.
    2. Pre­ven­tion Instead of Treat­ment
      It is bet­ter to pre­vent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it is formed.
    3. Design for Sep­a­ra­tion
      Sep­a­ra­tion and purifi­ca­tion oper­a­tions should be designed to min­i­mize energy con­sump­tion and mate­ri­als use.
    4. Max­i­mize Effi­ciency
      Prod­ucts, processes, and sys­tems should be designed to max­i­mize mass, energy, space, and time efficiency.
    5. Output-Pulled Ver­sus Input-Pushed
      Prod­ucts, processes, and sys­tems should be “out­put pulled” rather than “input pushed” through the use of energy and materials.
    6. Con­serve Com­plex­ity
      Embed­ded entropy and com­plex­ity must be viewed as an invest­ment when mak­ing design choices on recy­cle, reuse, or ben­e­fi­cial disposition.
    7. Dura­bil­ity Rather Than Immor­tal­ity
      Tar­geted dura­bil­ity, not immor­tal­ity, should be a design goal.
    8. Meet Need, Min­i­mize Excess
      Design for unnec­es­sary capac­ity or capa­bil­ity (e.g., “one size fits all”) solu­tions should be con­sid­ered a design flaw.
    9. Min­i­mize Mate­r­ial Diver­sity
      Mate­r­ial diver­sity in mul­ti­com­po­nent prod­ucts should be min­i­mized to pro­mote dis­as­sem­bly and value retention.
    10. Inte­grate Mate­r­ial and Energy Flows
      Design of prod­ucts, processes, and sys­tems must include inte­gra­tion and inter­con­nec­tiv­ity with avail­able energy and mate­ri­als flows.
    11. Design for Com­mer­cial “After­life“
      Prod­ucts, processes, and sys­tems should be designed for per­for­mance in a com­mer­cial “afterlife.”
    12. Renew­able Rather Than Deplet­ing
      Mate­r­ial and energy inputs should be renew­able rather than depleting.

    If you are in the mar­ket to buy a new prod­uct, it is quite inter­est­ing to look at a prod­uct through the green engi­neer­ing lens. While many design fea­tures are hard to eval­u­ate just look­ing at a prod­uct, some can be seen quite eas­ily and are able to influ­ence pur­chas­ing deci­sions. So, how does the iPhone fare, the Prius, or the sim­mer pan avail­able at Williams-Sonoma?

    Still, the sar­cas­tic side in me needs to men­tion that cer­tain prod­ucts land on the wrong side of prin­ci­ple #7 “Dura­bil­ity rather than immor­tal­ity”. I got too many prod­ucts lately that stop to func­tion way too soon. A lit­tle bit more “immor­tal­ity” would be appreciated!

    Share

    Topics: Sustainability Concepts, Tools & Methodologies | No Comments »

    Comments