• About Me

    Claus Schafhalter is executive level Management Consultant and owner of Sunogos - Change for the Better


    Click to get your own widget

  • « | Home | »

    Walmart’s Impact (3)

    By Claus Schafhalter | March 2, 2010

    Wal­mart, the largest US-retailer, makes another move to get more sus­tain­able. This time the tar­gets are spe­cific pop­u­lar prod­uct cat­e­gories and their sup­pli­ers. Sup­pli­ers are asked to exam­ine and reduce their car­bon foot­print by using less energy, less pack­ag­ing, more effi­cient processes, etc.

    It sounds good and it is good, at least in my opin­ion. How­ever, if you are one of the sup­pli­ers tar­geted you might feel dif­fer­ently. Wal­mart makes it clear that they expect greener prod­ucts from their sup­pli­ers. But beware, any costs related to make the prod­ucts dif­fer­ently will be the respon­si­bil­ity of each supplier.

    You can see this ini­tia­tive from two dif­fer­ent perspectives:

    1) It is a great idea that an orga­ni­za­tion as impor­tant as Wal­mart starts an ini­tia­tive to reduce the car­bon foot­print of the prod­ucts it sells. Who could argue with that?

    2) A Wal­mart sup­plier most cer­tainly already faces high pres­sure from Wal­mart to sup­ply goods at rock bot­tom prices. The sup­plier likely already ana­lyzed processes to find effi­cien­cies and sav­ings. Fol­low­ing this thought, fur­ther effi­ciency improve­ments to reduce the car­bon foot­print might not be cost effi­cient any more. The rea­son is that at a cer­tain level of effi­ciency the costs to improve effi­ciency go up while the addi­tional sav­ings go down. This has a lot to do with how we account – or bet­ter do not account – for envi­ron­men­tal costs. The cost a pol­luter has to pay for pol­lu­tion is still not any­where near to the real cost of polluting.

    If you are a sup­plier you need to get more green, at least you need to appear more green in Walmart’s eyes. To get there you have the choice to really get more sus­tain­able, which will cost you money. Or you try to com­pen­sate for these costs and cut some cor­ners else­where.  For instance reduc­ing qual­ity of your product.

    You don’t think so? Well, it hap­pened before, in a dif­fer­ent con­text. When car man­u­fac­tures were forced by increased com­pe­ti­tion to bring down their costs sub­stan­tially, they pressed their sup­pli­ers to reduce costs. Costs came down, qual­ity of their prod­ucts too. Which lead to some inter­est­ing unin­tended con­se­quences.

    Hope­fully Wal­mart rec­og­nizes that they are in this together with their sup­pli­ers. And hope­fully Wal­mart offers more than only press­ing their sup­pli­ers into a greener future. Part­ner­ing with sup­pli­ers to achieve a com­mon goal would be an impor­tant step, I think.

    Claus Schafhal­ter, Sunogos

    Share

    Topics: News, Sustainable Technology | No Comments »

    Comments